Wednesday, August 26, 2020

No topic Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

No theme - Essay Example Reliability is another critical quality for a client assistance agent. On the off chance that the clients can't have confidence in what the agent is stating, they won't wish to execute with him. Along these lines, one must not make bogus or misrepresented cases, and should just guarantee what they can convey. A client assistance agent should consistently be gracious and persistent. They should shun getting fomented, regardless of whether the client is setting baseless expectations. They should listen to the client, and give close consideration to their necessities and needs. After their necessities are built up, the client support delegate should react obligingly and disclose to the client in detail, what he has asked about. Also, a client care delegate must have the option to take care of issues in a speedy and proficient way. They should be adaptable and pleasing to the customers’ needs. I have been working in the client support field for a long time at this point, which has blessed me with an outstanding understanding of how to manage clients. This involvement with the field will be an extraordinary bit of leeway for me while connecting with people. I am a persevering individual and will have no apprehensions about investing additional push to guarantee consumer loyalty.

Saturday, August 22, 2020

French Revolution Essay Example for Free

French Revolution Essay To completely clarify the main driver of Modern Nationalism, one must investigate what has happened in the French Revolution. In 1789, the French transformation was conceived. There were changes of intensity procurement in the crucial pieces of Europe. On the fourteenth of July 1789, Bastille was under attack and on October the King Louis XVI and Royal Family was deposed from Versailles and wound up to Paris. Lord Louis XVI was the ruler in those days so his destruction can be likened to an all out loss of request and authority. There were a few endeavors to get away from the ouster of King Louis XVI yet sadly it fizzled. With no reasonable control over the immense land, a get together was shaped to have a balanced and composed republic contained Austria, Holland, Prussia and Sardinia. At the point when the republic was framed, King Louis was executed for his oppression which have involved for the growing of the Revolutionary Tribunal. France didn't partake with this belief system in view of the opposition of Napoleon Bonaparte. Napoleon Bonaparte gained control of the Consulate to multiply a uniform law, correspondence, property rights and annihilation of feudalism. Geologically, France is arranged between the two huge bunches of the liberal supporters. Essentially, the French Revolution was the conflict between the dissidents and the radicals. Leftists are those individuals who cling to an only society through the celestial law that is genetic through culture while radicals are the individuals who stick to line of reasoning that change and variety from the old framework must show for a superior society. From the conflicts of the two contradicting philosophies of the French Revolution, another belief system was shaped which is the Modern Nationalism. Patriotism is a belief system which centers around the solidarity of the individuals from the country to have a solitary national character offered premise to ethnicity, birthplace and the social foundation of these countries (Miscevic, 2005). The quintessence of holding fast to the Nationalist Ideology is to set up a state. A state is political substance that is expected to have a high level of sway (Miscevic, 2005). The state has a high sway since it is expected that the force is unified with this element. The entirety of the individuals from the country must stand to the forced terms and conditions made by the state. The state can be polymorphous in way that it tends to be just and furthermore can be authoritarian. The two contradicting realms of Italy and Germany were joined together. In spite of their differentiating convictions, they figured out how to cure the circumstance and push through for the improvement of the country. In 1871, they were joined together however the occasions turned sour when the country required a sole head of the two states. It is expected and anticipated that there will be strife among Italy and Germany in light of their adherence to Liberalism and Nationalism, separately. Guissepe Mazzini was an extreme progressive mastermind that saw the Italy as a state under an umbrella of control by an outside power. He needed to liberate Italy from nationalistic belief system that it has clung to since he was a progressive. With his purposeful publicity crucial, was placed into bars in Italy. His progressive demonstration were incredibly discredited by the patriot see subsequently he didn't quit seeking after his exertion of moving Italy to a liberal state. Patriotism is a decent belief system however it has a few escape clauses like some other philosophies. Some of them are: it is excessively prescient and pompous, why, since it generally expects to join individuals that are totally unique in relation to each other. Social relativism can be an issue for patriotism. Second, the determination of express that will be the focal point of power, this is significant thus nobody could determine what potential characteristics should a decent state have and everything comes down to who has the more prominent methods for creation. In conclusion, it accept that the world has an amicable connection, yet truly, we are driven by struggle. References Cody, D. (2007). French Revolution. The Victorian Website. Hartwick College. Recovered on November 6, 2007 from http://www. victorianweb. organization/history/hist7. html Spitzer, A. (2005). Tocqueville’s Modern Nationalism. Oxford Journals. College of Iowa. Recovered on November 6, 2007 from http://fh. oxfordjournals. organization/cgi/content/conceptual/19/1/48 Chastain, J. (2004). Guissepe Mazzini. Reference book of 1848 Revolutions. Recovered on November 6, 2007 from http://www. ohiou. edu/~chastain/list. htm Chew, R. (1995). Napoleon I: Emperor of French. Lucidcafe Website. Recovered on November 6, 2007 from http://www. lucidcafe. com/lucidcafe. html Miscevic, N. (2005). Patriotism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Recovered on November 6, 2007 from http://plato. stanford. edu/passages/patriotism/#1. 2

Thursday, August 13, 2020

Language (die Sprache)

Language (die Sprache) Language is a funny thing. Its so natural and as kids we pick it up quite readily from those around us. And now, while it is more difficult, you can still learn an entirely new way to think, to communicate, to ponder. Its quite incredible really. Coming from the US, I had it easy overall. Growing up I spoke English from birth, and the few foreign words I learned were more novelties than anything else. But now, here I am, experiencing what its like to live some place else, some place with a new language. Its difficult. Im envious of those who are fluent in both those who simply upon hearing my accent switch seamlessly into English. But also, those people are incredibly interesting in how they interact, particularly in the lab. Unsurprisingly, Germans speak to each other in German. But there are foreigners here too, a decent fraction. And our institute often works with foreign research institutes. Im reading a thesis of a friend; he could have written in English quite easily. It would have been deemed better, more advantageous for being recognized. But the decision to write in German wasnt based on what would be the easiest (German) or what others thought would be best for ones career. Instead, the decision was made from a sort of nostalgia writing in the language of his land, his people, writing in a language that he enjoyed but felt was slowly being squeezed out. Germany is no tiny country in science. German isnt a tiny dialect spoken by only 10 people. But still there is this nostalgia, a feeling that something would be lost if everyone just used 1 language, even just for scientific publications, even when a common language would be more efficient. Which brings up the question: what actually would be lost? Why might it be better to have this linguistic diversity? And to answer that, Ill expand the topic to cultural diversities, and some thoughts I have lingering from the spring. Watching Human Planet (similar to the Blue Planet except the main characters are humans instead of the oceans) my friend brought up a quote related to the series. It went along the lines of: the reason that its important that we recognize and celebrate these different peoples, these different lives, is because it reminds us that we are able to live a different way. That life is not constrained to the way it currently is in our neighborhood, in our culture, in our land. Its important to remember that there are other ways to live. Language is tied to that. Staying aware of linguistic diversity also means keeping in mind the totally different lifestyles which humans can and have held. Language affects the way we live, not by setting hard limitations (as suggested in 1984 but rather in guiding what we tend to think about most often. As an example, you probably dont pay as much attention to the differences between light + dark blue as the typical native Russian speaker, not because their eyes are better, but because they dont recognize the two as the same color. Through language you are trained to classify and give order to the world in different ways, and then your mind learns to subconsciously process its surroundings. (If youre interested, Through the Language Glass is quite good). So what does that mean? Does it mean that some languages naturally tend to help you think more scientifically. Probably not, at least to a significant degree. Sure, not having a counting scheme might make it difficult (the Pirah people being most popularized by the media). But I think overall, the message lies more in the decision to write in German in the first place. By choosing to write in German, a message was most certainly sent. This scientist found the linguistic diversity of the german-speaking world, and indirectly the cultural diversity of the entire world to be of greater value than scientific expediency. An intimate aspect of his thesis became, indirectly, that there is more to science than just utility. There is diversity, there is language, there is culture intricately interwoven. Eric Gentry Sophomore MIT-Germany Program Internship: University of Heidelberg This post was first published on Gedanken in Germany: http://gedankeningermany.blogspot.de/